home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!kepler1!andrew
- From: andrew@rentec.com (Andrew Mullhaupt)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Blue Sky
- Message-ID: <1115@kepler1.rentec.com>
- Date: 24 Jul 92 13:49:36 GMT
- References: <10018@vice.ICO.TEK.COM> <1992Jul23.010953.6388@math.ucla.edu>
- Organization: Renaissance Technologies Corp., Setauket, NY.
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Jul23.010953.6388@math.ucla.edu> barry@arnold.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman) writes:
- >In article <10018@vice.ICO.TEK.COM> hall@vice.ICO.TEK.COM (Hal Lillywhite)
- >writes:
- >> And I find it peculiar that although there are blue birds, there are
- >> no blue raptors that I know of. Can you imagine the advantage a sky-
- >> blue hawk would have? His prey would have a very difficult time seeing
- >> him until it was too late. I wonder why such an obvious advantage
- >> seems not to have developed.
-
- >Actually, he should be blue on the bottom and dark on top,
- >so that he ends up blending in when viewed from above or below.
- >Thats "why" fish are silver on the bottom and dark on top, perhaps
-
- Some carnivorous birds have adopted this strategy - penguins. However the
- important factor which hawks and other raptors do not have in common with
- penguins is that penguins are subject to in-flight predation. (The word flight
- can be applied here in the best fluid dynamic tradition.) Now many land based
- predators use camouflage - (polar bears, tigers, etc.) - and owls use important
- flight silencing techniques. So I don't know why raptors don't seem to have
- such a strategy.
-
- Later,
- Andrew Mullhaupt
-
-