home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!csus.edu!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfy
- From: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: QPKD and Quantum Communications
- Keywords: Communications Public Snide Remarks
- Message-ID: <3925@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 92 18:29:15 PDT
- Sender: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
- Reply-To: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
- Lines: 36
-
-
-
- In article <3919@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>, snarfy@cruzio writes:
- > > Mr Weiner says:
- > > > This has nothing to do with FTL anything.
-
- > > Dogmatic sort aren't you ? Instantaneous is by definition faster than
- > > light.
-
- > Look, bozo, if you're going to quote private e-mail, get it right...
-
-
- Do you consider the sci.physics forum to be your Private E-Mail?
-
- >....starting with my name.
-
- A thousand pardons ,Dick , I mean Frank , I mean Mr. Wiener, There
- hows that?
-
-
- > > My "this" was in reference to EPR as a means
- > > of communication,....
-
- Thank you for clarifying that.
-
- > > .....which is not instantanous communication, unless, of
- > > course, you start defining words as you go along.
-
- I saw EPR mentioned nowhere in this discussion until you brought
- it up. That makes you responsible for defining the term (and
- properly assigning pronouns) . Before we allow this
- conversation to deteriorate further , what's REALLY bothering
- you? No kidding , I'm interested - Snarfy (if you prefer
- ``Bozo'', fine ,but no points for originality.)
-
-
-