home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!planchet.rutgers.edu!nanotech
- From: dbt@cellar.org
- Newsgroups: sci.nanotech
- Subject: Terraforming Venus and the Hydrogen Problem
- Message-ID: <Jul.29.20.29.48.1992.6153@planchet.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 30 Jul 92 00:29:49 GMT
- Sender: nanotech@planchet.rutgers.edu
- Organization: The Cellar BBS and public access system
- Lines: 28
- Approved: nanotech@aramis.rutgers.edu
-
- My experience with nuclear physics is very limited, but I do know that it is
- possible to generate hydrogen from other elements in both fusion and fission
- reactions. If this could be done efficiently and safely, much of the carbon
- in the atmosphere of Venus could conceivably be converted to hydrogen and
- other light elements (other than carbon). It could also be done more quickly
- than harvesting iceballs from the Oort cloud.
-
- I also think the chances of finding as massive an iceball as would be
- required to make an Earth-style ocean on Venus are pretty small. Then, does a
- planet really need as much ocean as we have here? Assume an ocean with
- one-tenth the mass of water for Venus. It would make things a lot easier and
- yield more habitable land.
-
- Back to iceballs, has anyone considered that most of the moons of the gas
- giants are mainly ice? Water is quite abundant in the universe. Going to the
- Oort cloud might be the difficult way do get water.
-
- Of course, if we do want to go to the Oort cloud, we can settle for smaller
- iceballs. With a hundred prperly-aimed iceballs of JUST the right size, I bet
- we could start Venus rotating fast enough to generate a Van Allen belt and
- NOT make the crust unstable.
-
- Just a few ideas on planetary engineering from a person with a Lego-level
- appreciation of the subject.
-
- [In matters nuclear, as a rule of thumb, all roads lead to iron; lighter
- elements want to fuse and heavier ones want to fizz.
- --JoSH]
-