home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.med
- Path: sparky!uunet!island!green
- From: green@island.COM (Robert Greenstein)
- Subject: Re: Questions for MDs
- Message-ID: <1992Jul27.195220.5341@island.COM>
- Sender: usenet@island.COM (The Usenet mail target)
- Organization: Strawman Incorporated
- References: <5h+m9j-@dixie.com> <1992Jul20.220034.8390@island.COM> <15788@pitt.UUCP>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 19:52:20 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <15788@pitt.UUCP> km@cs.pitt.edu (Ken Mitchum) writes:
- >In article <1992Jul20.220034.8390@island.COM> green@island.COM (Robert Greenstein) writes:
- >>
- >>I agree with you in principle. But the problem is that very often,
- >>particularly with cancer, patients are told they have a chance with
- >>treatment which the doctors know full well won't work. IF the patient
- >>was told the truth, he or she might have time to look into some alternative
- >>treatment. Now the doctor in question might think that all alternative
- >>treatments are a big crock. But isn't that for the patient to decide?
- >
- >No ethical physician will attempt treatment of a hopeless case unless
- >it is at the insistence of the patient and family. If you look in
- >oncology textbooks, you will find that treatment of advanced cancers
- >is palliative, not curative, and this is always explained to the
- >patient. Palliative therapy may lead to longer survival and to a
- >higher quality of life before the patient dies.
-
- It certainly would be unethical to treat a hopeless case in most circumstances.
- My objection is that its the physician that decides when a case is hopeless.
- THe oncology textbooks do not have all the answers.
- --
- ******************************************************************************
- Robert Greenstein What the fool cannot learn he laughs at, thinking
- green@island.com that by his laughter he shows superiority instead
- of latent idiocy - M. Corelli
-