home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.lang
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!crchh327!crchh424!gryphon
- From: gryphon@crchh424.BNR.CA (Joe Widows)
- Subject: Re: what has happened to "ascribe" ?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.032652.15096@bnr.ca>
- Sender: news@bnr.ca (News on crchh327)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crchh424
- Reply-To: gryphon@bnrrch43.bnr.rich
- Organization: BNR
- References: <1992Jul22.234558.15054@alf.uib.no> <8200@amsaa-cleo.brl.mil> <1992Jul21.190619.21438@alf.uib.no> <92204.135724GRV101@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 03:26:52 GMT
- Lines: 69
-
- In article <1992Jul22.234558.15054@alf.uib.no>, hlirg@alf.uib.no (Roger
- Greenwald) writes:
- > In article <92204.135724GRV101@psuvm.psu.edu> Callec Dradja
- <GRV101@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
- > >In article <1992Jul21.190619.21438@alf.uib.no>, hlirg@alf.uib.no (Roger
- > >Greenwald) says:
- > >>
- > >>
- > >>A worse one is that the New York
- > >>Times usually contains at least a few sentences every day in
- > >>which the verb does not agree with the subject in number.
- > >>The most common case is that of sentences that begin with
- > >>"There is" or "there was," and then follow up with a list
- > >>of items, each of which is singular. (There is anger and
- > >>frustration in Sarajevo tonight.) But there are many other
- > >>cases as well. You can say the writers can't count from
- > >>one to two; or you can say that the plural form of "to be"
- > >>is gradually disappearing from English. The latter is a linguist's
- > >>type of description. In this case it's probably correct, even if it
- > >>may be regrettable.
- > >>--
- > >I think that this phenomena is not new. We talked about this very
- > >topic in one of my grammar classes and it seems that in a list,
- > >Standard English speakers will use a verb that agrees with the nearest
- > >subject. This type of speech has been used by educated speakers for
- > >quite some time.
- > >
- > "phenomena" is plural :-) (but I'm sure not everyone who writes
- > for the NY Times knows that either).
- >
- > It is true that in a sentence that contains a list, especially
- > if it starts with expletive "There," a native speaker may feel
- > it "sounds funny" to have "are" followed by a singular noun; but
- > this tends to be the case only when the noun is preceded by
- > an indefinite article. Thus: "There are a chair and a table on
- > the east wall" puts "are" next to "a chair", and that can
- > sound odd. But "There are anger and frustration here tonight"
- > should not sound equally odd (or, in my view, odd at all).
- >
- > If you consult Fowler on what to do if a verb comes after, say,
- > a subject consisting of a plural noun, "or", and then a singular
- > noun, you will probably find that he says one way out is
- > to make the verb agree with the noun that is closest, but
- > that the BEST way out is to recast the sentence! I agree.
- > Note, however, that this was not the sort of case I was referring
- > to as a lack of agreement.
- > --
- > Roger Greenwald
- > Greenwald@hf.uib.no (address valid only until 10 August 1992)
-
- In the examples with 'there' in the 'subject', I would like to point out
- that this is an idiomatic expression of the same class as 'It's raining'
- or 'It's snowing' or 'There's trouble here.' These kinds of expressions
- carry 'META-BAGGAGE' or context information supplied by the listener.
-
- Most of the conflict with number and verb seem to be in constructs where
- one might say "THERE'S" < list or conjucate of items> < some consequence>
- 'There's anger and frustration, here' Seems to be of the idomatic form.
- Can you tell me why this is 'non-standard' English? Idioms are tricky,
- we say one thing and mean something else, and frequently impose structure
- that is only convenient.
-
- widows
- Linguist in the dark.
-
- DISCLAIMER: BNR builds telephones, not opinions.
- ANTIDISCLAIMER: The wrong stuff is mine, (the right stuff, too)
-
-
-