home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.environment:10159 sci.electronics:13438 rec.autos.tech:10238
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!mmm
- From: mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment,sci.electronics,rec.autos.tech
- Subject: Re: Letters to the Editor: Blazing Ta
- Message-ID: <62978@cup.portal.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 23:31:55 PDT
- Organization: The Portal System (TM)
- References: <1466601724@igc.org>
- <1992Jul24.044623.3155@cco.caltech.edu>,<62876@cup.portal.com>
- <1992Jul27.105400.3328@cco.caltech.edu>
- Lines: 35
-
- In sci.environment, I commented that ignition coils generate the
- spark on the inward-going sweep of the magnetic field, because that
- produces a bigger spark than using the outward-going stroke of
- the magnetic field. Somebody disagreed with me saying:
-
- > The way an automobile ignition coils works is that, over a period of time, a
- > current is set up in a coil. When the circuit is opened, and the capicitor
- > (aka the condensor) is switched into the circuit, the voltage across the
- > capicitor builds up in accordance with the differential equation:
- > dV
- > -- = I(t)/C
- > dt
- >
- > where, at the beginning of the charging of the capacitor, the current, I is the
- > current that was flowing in the coil at the time the circuit was switched. The
- > coil follows the differential equation:
- >
- > dI
- > -- = LV(t)
- > dt
- >
- > When the voltage exceeds that necessary to create a spark across the spark gap
- > in the plug, the capacitor discharges, providing the energy necessary to ignite
- > the fuel (actually, the coil and the capacitor provide a resonant circuit in
- > which the spark gap provides a resistive component, so the current through the
- > gap oscillates). What we've got is a circuit that transforms the 12 volts from
- > the battery to a high enough voltage to initiate the spark. The bullshit you
- > cite about the
- > battery into "_collapse_ of the magnetic field ... yield[ing] a bigger spark
- > than the outward-going swing of the field" show a total lack of understanding
- > of electromagnetism on your part.
-
-
- Would a knowledgable person in rec.auto.tech or sci.electronics
- please settle this debate?
-