home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
- From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Subject: Re: Clinton, Gore, and the End of the Automobile Age
- Message-ID: <1992Jul25.060358.10421@ke4zv.uucp>
- Date: 25 Jul 92 06:03:58 GMT
- References: <BrrBLr.n1n@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <1992Jul22.005849.16417@s1.gov> <BruItw.9BD@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <1992Jul23.230804.1294@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
- Organization: Gannett Technologies Group
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1992Jul23.230804.1294@ccu.umanitoba.ca> ens@ccu.umanitoba.ca writes:
- >
- >In a densely populated area, everyone benefits from public
- >transportation. Witness Paris, London or NYC. Drivers would certainly
- >suffer in NYC if the subway shut down. Beyond the question of
- >congestion, electric trains produce less polution and everyone
- >benefits from that too. Similar justification (arguable, perhaps) is
- >used for diesel buses.
- >
- >I'm not familiar with LA but there are cities where public transportation
- >is not just safer and cleaner, but necessary, and for many purposes, simpler
- >faster, more convenient, and if you like reading, more comfortable.
-
- In NYC the subway is a necessity, but in cities like Los Angles, Atlanta,
- Houston, and a host of others the density is not high enough across broad
- areas of the city and population originations and destinations are too widely
- spread in all directions to be served by fixed rail. Diesel bus systems are
- only superior on limited routes at limited times. Thus they don't meet the
- diverse needs of many people.
-
- BART has the advantage of serving a small inner city core and a geographically
- constrained bedroom population along the Bay penninsula. This "strip city"
- approach is well suited to rail transit. Los Angles, and Atlanta, have
- multiple cores dispersed about the area and bedroom populations scattered
- widely in all directions. The hub and spoke systems that try to serve their
- transit needs are woefully inefficient in travel time and energy efficiency.
- Note that MARTA was designed by the same engineering firm that did BART.
- Their failure here should show that one size does not fit all.
-
- Gary
-