home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.electronics:13218 rec.audio:10765 alt.folklore.computers:11047
- Newsgroups: sci.electronics,rec.audio,alt.folklore.computers
- Path: sparky!uunet!telebit!eric
- From: eric@telebit.com (Eric Smith)
- Subject: Re: Life after CDs
- In-Reply-To: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu's message of Thu, 23 Jul 1992 22:19:24 GMT
- Message-ID: <ERIC.92Jul23182226@napa.telebit.com>
- Sender: news@telebit.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: napa.telebit.com
- Organization: Telebit Corporation
- References: <Brr3A6.5IA@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Jul23.041115.20377@bilver.uucp>
- <14mdkjINNb4m@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM>
- <1992Jul23.221924.681@news.columbia.edu>
- Date: 23 Jul 92 18:22:26
- Lines: 11
-
- >>On Thu, 23 Jul 1992 22:19:24 GMT, lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner) said:
- > The part I heard was that this requirement wasn't going to work at the
- > designated sample rate of 48 KHz, so they cut it back to 44.1 to squeeze it
- > in.
-
- I seriously doubt that, since PCM recording equipment already existed that
- used 44.056 KHz sampling, whereas I don't think anything in mass production
- used 48.0 KHz sampling at that time.
-
- Cheers,
- Eric
-