NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16/NN_1992_16.iso/spool/rec/arts/sf/misc/2287

Internet Message Format | 1992-07-30 | 4.1 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!walter!phelix!mdl
From: mdl@phelixsalt (Michael Lynch)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.misc
Subject: Re: Puritans (Re: Agnostics and Athiests)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 30 Jul 92 17:01:43 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Reply-To: mdl@phelixsalt (Michael Lynch)
Organization: Bellcore
Lines: 66
Nntp-Posting-Host: phelix.bellcore.com

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (sheila) writes:
|> In article <[e-mail]>
|> [e-mail] (Thomas Omar Smith) writes:
|> >Which leads to an interesting point.  If you're predestined, then why be
|> >good.  You're already guaranteed salvation.  If you're not predestined,
|> >then you have nothing to lose by being bad.  Hmmmm.
|> >
|>
|> O, now we can talk books. If you are really interested in this point,
|> read some books about the puritans, I guess. Matt, my beloved, took
|> a history class last summer session and kept bringing home horrible
|> details about puritans (wait, perhaps I have the wrong group).
|> I think they believed that god at some point would give them a sign
|> determining their predestiny.
|> I wish I could refer you to a book. I havn't read up on this topic.
|> I seem to remember a book called _The Puritan Dilemma_ which Matt
|> read for history class, but when I asked him if it was interesting
|> reading, he said to read _The Way of Duty_ instead. I went to class
|> with him one day, and his history professor is an interesting teacher.
|>
|> Matt told me a story about a young lady who was so obsessed with her
|> destiny that she threw her baby into a well, because she felt that
|> anyone who did such a thing would certainly not be part of the elect.
|> Her preacher told her that she still didn't truly know.
|> I think I will study about this one day, (but I want to study too many
|> things) because it is interesting to think about the effects of thinking
|> this way.
|>
|> When I was a christian I would make up interesting interpretations on
|> predestination. Such fun thrown away now that I am not. No, I bet I
|> could still have lots of theological interpitational fun.
|>
|> btw, it is simply ghastly, no awful, no SINFUL, the talk of lying to
|> oneself. Terribly terrible atrocious and awful to attempt to believe
|> something that is not part of one's personal integrity and if I
|> were a diety I would not respect one who did that.
|>
|> Has no one mentioned the point that one may choose simply not to
|> care whether or not a (for example) Judeo-Christian MOnothestic
|> deity exists, and their attitude is, if Judeo-Christian Monothestic
|> said Deity exists, I don't care and choose not to worship it because
|> I have no respect for it. I wash my hands of the whole matter. (nice
|> that, washing ones hands of the whole matter.)
|> (one of my conclusions is that any such diety as given in my
|> example is simply insane. I think it would have OCD. IT is also rather
|> paranoid. no, I must confess, I don't think I can come up with
|> these conclusions -- well, simply becuase all the descriptions
|> that I am making these conclusions from are from descriptions based
|> on human perceptions, therefore I suppose I shoudl say, the describers
|> are obsessive and paranoid and crazy and have delusions of grandeur.)
|> (it is also simply too too annoying that people keep insisting upon
|> creating such anthropomorphic gods. too too ridiculous.)
|> (I am so annoyed.)
|> (I am so annoyed that I am using this annoying tone of voice)
|> --
|> stark raving sane!   [e-mail]


I'm gonna stay on the sidelines of this issue and just spectate,
but I have to say, Sheila, that yours was a truly refreshing post.
Whether I agree with you or not (and I'm not sure, because I not sure
exactly what you said) I read your article with a smile.  I have a
hunch you'd be a very interesting person to sit opposite at the debate
table.

Mike Lynch