home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a710
- From: Crawford_Kilian@mindlink.bc.ca (Crawford Kilian)
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Subject: Re: Research in Fiction
- Message-ID: <13818@mindlink.bc.ca>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 23:18:37 GMT
- Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
- Distribution: world
- Lines: 22
-
- Glad to see this thread still continues...In my experience, research (of
- course) provides the factual material that contributes to the verisimilitude of
- the story; the Kiwi who had trouble with Toronto distances would really bother
- only the Torontonians who would have direct knowledge of the distance involved
- in the story. Still, one wants to be accurate if only out of sheer pride in
- craft.
-
- But research can also point to useful directions for the story. For example, in
- reseaching gladiatorial combat in ancient Rome, I learned that those who came
- in second were stashed under the Collosseum in a small room where people would
- come to fill small vials with blood (this being considered a useful medicine,
- though a transfusion from the winner might seem more logical). So in my novel
- Rogue Emperor, my hero blunders into this room and encounters a female
- gladiatrix (excuse the bilingual redundancy) who will come in very useful later
- in the story. (She's mourning her boyfriend's death and my hero's small
- consolatory touch makes a friend of her.)
-
- The problem is keeping the reseach from swamping the story. The writer has to
- resist the urge to cough up potted essays on The Roman Tenement, Roman
- Transportation Systems, The Sex Life of Augustus, or whatever; no matter how
- interesting you may find it, your research is pointless if it doesn't move the
- story ahead.
-