>> 1. Bruce is a computer program, which makes you an idiot for continually arguing with him.
>>
>
>By this line of reasoning, everyone who has ever walked into a video arcade
>is an even bigger idiot; at least what I'm doing is free of charge.
Your line of reasoning is quite invalid, for many intelligent people (myself
included) go to arcades rather regularly. The only thing you and your idiots
(who are incapable of finding arcades) know how to do is masturbate.
>> 2. Bruce is not a computer program, which makes your whole argument null and
>> void.
>>
>
>My argument remains sound.
Your argument remains invalid. Brewmeister appears to be quite informed.
>> Keep writing stupid shit like this, and you will become acquainted with Bur.
>> Bur uses some of the most creative profanity imaginable when flaming idiots
>> like you. Either you're arguing with a computer, or you're contradicting
>> yourself in your own circular arguement.
>>
>>
>
>If Bur wants to flame a true idiot, he should probably look you up. On the
>other hand, if he's as good as you say, you're probably not worth his time.
No, that idiot is, in fact, you.
>> Ah, the very supposition that has made so many psychologists and psychoanalysts
>> rich. The old "denial is the first symptom of addiction." Now it's true that
>> many alcoholics, for instance, deny being alcoholics. On the other hand, socialdrinkers will also deny being alcoholics, which is the first sign of alcoholism,so we better get them into therapy immediately. (If they have appropriate
>> insurance, of course.)
>
>Whoa! You're taking this alcoholism thing much to seriously, Budweiser. I
>hope I didn't hit a nerve.
At least Brewmeister knows how to initiate thought processes, which I see you
are still incapable of doing. You still require repair.
>> >You apparently aren't programmed to realize that your whole purpose in life
>> >is to suck up to Troll. I hope he's off working on a new, improved version
>> >of you (assuming he can keep his hands off of his dick long enough).
>>
>> The classical Freudian paradigm. Everything boils down to childhood trauma or
>> some aspect of sexuality. Perhaps you are suffering from penis envy?
>>
>
>As to the latter, envy of Troll's excuse for a penis or any other putrid,
>weeping, crab-infested, tick-ridden, decomposing part of his repugnant,
>bloated anatomy is beyond my comprehension.
As is everything else in this world.
>> >Ah, yes. My first car was a Toyota. Burned enough oil to have staved off
>> >the energy crunch. I sold it for $50 at 45,000 miles.
>>
>> You probably didn't maintain it properly, shithead. See in the glovebox, there
>> was this little book called an OWNERS MANUAL. In the OWNERS MANUAL, there's
>> what we call a MAINTAINANCE SCHEDULE. Ahhh, forget it.
>
>Yeah, sure, I guess I could have taken it to a machine shop and had it
>rebuilt from the ground up. Then I would have had a brand new piece of
>shit that would have lasted another 45,000 miles before I had to do it all
>over again. Instead, I bought a Ford which has lasted me for the past 12
>years, and is still going strong.
If you had changed the oil at the proper interval, your Toyota would still be
running today. Too bad changing the oil is not on your list of scheduled
maintenance. You probably couldn't change your car's oil if you tried.
You're too afraid you'll get a little dirty. Picky, picky, picky.
>> Great. Just what a poor troubled soul wants to hear. Psychobabble spoken
>> with a Teeexas aaaacceyant.
>
>Oh. The Georgia cracker takes offense at my "accent." I betchyew got a
>ole Ty-oter up on blocks in yer fron-chard.
No, Toyotas are never up on blocks except for the 3 month/3,000 mile oil
change which you believe is unnecessary. Lokks like your car just died.
--
Bruce A. Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu) | In the Basement Bars,
PSU Geographic Information Systems | In the Backs of Cars,
