home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / misc / headline / 4949 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-21  |  1.4 KB

  1. Xref: sparky misc.headlines:4949 talk.politics.misc:35180 talk.politics.mideast:16993 soc.culture.arabic:2812 alt.conspiracy:9303 alt.censorship:6122 soc.rights.human:2610
  2. Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,soc.culture.arabic,alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,soc.rights.human
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!nucsrl!ddsw1!arf
  4. From: arf@ddsw1.mcs.com (Jack Schmidling)
  5. Subject: Re: Apology to Limbaugh Fans
  6. Message-ID: <1992Jul22.051907.5567@ddsw1.mcs.com>
  7. Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Chicago, IL
  8. References: <1992Jul20.161420.22047@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> <1992Jul21.053546.16208@ddsw1.mcs.com> <1992Jul21.164922.3118@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
  9. Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 05:19:07 GMT
  10. X-Disclaimer:  Material posted in this article is the sole responsibility of
  11.                 the poster and does not represent MCSNet or the system owners.
  12. Lines: 15
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Jul21.164922.3118@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> friedenb@frith.egr.msu.edu (Gedaliah Friedenberg) writes:
  15. >
  16. >I would like to apologize to all of the Rush Limbaugh fans that I 
  17. >offended by comparing Rush to bARF.  
  18. >
  19. >My criticism of Rush still stands, but through email discussions I have
  20. >come to realize that the difference between bARF and Rush is the issue
  21. >of intent and mailce. 
  22.  
  23.  
  24. ARF says:
  25.  
  26. Are we to believe that Rush has told you that ARF is malicious?
  27.  
  28. arf
  29.