home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|inews!tmcconne
- From: tmcconne@sedona.intel.com (Tom McConnell)
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
- Subject: Re: Re:
- Message-ID: <12573@inews.intel.com>
- Date: 29 Jul 92 19:12:42 GMT
- References: <9207290546.AA47295@st6000.sct.edu> <12567@inews.intel.com>
- Sender: news@inews.intel.com
- Reply-To: tmcconne@sedona.intel.com
- Distribution: gnu
- Organization: Intel Corporation
- Lines: 36
- Originator: tmcconne@sedona
-
-
- In article <12567@inews.intel.com>, tmcconne@sedona.intel.com (Tom McConnell) writes:
- >
- > In article <9207290546.AA47295@st6000.sct.edu>, install2@st6000.sct.edu (Ron Skopitz) writes:
- > >
- > > Howdy!
- > > Thanks all for the help! GCC compiled flawlessly after your
- > > instructions! Now I assuming that I must build the libraries in order to
- > > get anything to work. (?) I compiled gcc into an install acount (not into
- > > /bin/...) so maybr that is part of my trouble with the following error I get
- > > when trying to compile libraries. Any suggestions??? Once again, this is
- > > an RS/6000 running AIX 3.2. Thanks!!
- > >
- >
- > If you want g++, yes, you must compile libg++. Other than that there are no
- > libraries.
- >
-
- Ok, ok, you don't "need" to compile libg++ for g++. But if you don't have any
- other class libraries hanging out somewhere, g++ is somewhat useless except as
- an extravagent C++-style program parser. Since g++ is just gcc using the -lg++
- library (g++ is just a script) I jumped to the conclusion that most people would
- use libg++ as their first C++ class library.
-
- But you don't have to ... :)
-
- Cheers,
-
- Tom McConnell
-
-
- --
- Tom McConnell | Internet: tmcconne@sedona.intel.com
- Intel, Corp. C3-21 | Phone: (602)-554-8229
- 5000 W. Chandler Blvd. | The opinions expressed are my own. No one in
- Chandler, AZ 85226 | their right mind would claim them.
-