home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / virus / 3438 next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-21  |  997 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!netnews.cc.lehigh.edu!news
  2. From: D.Ivens@deakin.OZ.AU (David H. Ivens)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.virus
  4. Subject: VET as good as Viruscan? (PC)
  5. Message-ID: <0004.9207211508.AA11928@barnabas.cert.org>
  6. Date: 17 Jul 92 01:55:28 GMT
  7. Sender: virus-l@lehigh.edu
  8. Lines: 13
  9. Approved: news@netnews.cc.lehigh.edu
  10.  
  11. I have evaluated VET anti-virus software (Australia) and it seems a very
  12. good alternative to the expensive Viruscan.
  13.  
  14. Has anyone had problems with this software?
  15.  
  16. We do not get a lot of viruses and are considering a site licence for VET.
  17.  
  18. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
  19. David H.Ivens,                                            Ph. 61 52 272508
  20. Computing & Communications Services,                      Fax 61 52 272010
  21. Deakin University,
  22. Geelong, Victoria, Australia   3217             email: davidi@deakin.OZ.AU
  23. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
  24.