home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!randvax!edhall
- From: edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Subject: Re: esix 4.0.4 experiences
- Message-ID: <3667@randvax.rand.org>
- Date: 31 Jul 92 00:05:48 GMT
- References: <3658@randvax.rand.org> <712539230snx@constant.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: news@randvax.rand.org
- Organization: RAND Corporation.
- Lines: 12
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ives.rand.org
-
- In article <712539230snx@constant.demon.co.uk> slangley@constant.demon.co.uk (Simon Langley) writes:
- >The Esix slip is not that much use for a point-to-point setup as it requires
- >three totally separate network addresses. I wanted to connect my machine
- >(158.152.8.12) to a gateway machine (158.152.1.65) and the Esix slip cannot
- >do this. This came from Esix tech support BTW.
-
- That's how I used it. The SLIP connection was its own Class C network.
- A waste, I know; my current setup (with Marc Boucher's PPP) doesn't use
- any such nonsense.
-
- -Ed Hall
- edhall@rand.org
-