home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!cdin-1!icdi10!fr
- From: fr@compu.com (Fred Rump from home)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Subject: Re: Controversy, objectivity, and common sense...
- Message-ID: <1992Jul29.150926.3154@compu.com>
- Date: 29 Jul 92 15:09:26 GMT
- References: <fluet.711428210@ee.ualberta.ca> <1992Jul21.075346.26610@dellunix.dell.com> <+mfm04=@dixie.com> <1992Jul26.034856.9380@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Jul27.203323.25102@crd.ge.com> <1992Jul28.145939.13774@rwwa.COM>
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: CompuData Inc.
- Lines: 13
-
- witr@rwwa.COM (Robert Withrow) writes:
-
- >Perhaps, Bill, you will be so kind as to explain to us what qualifies
- >your views as more ``objective'' than Mr. De Armond's are.
-
- It would seem that Bill reacted towards a biased accusation. Apparently his
- motive was to use medicine of a similar nature to attempt a cure. IE De Armond
- was to tell the world about how terrible Dell support is and Bill's only
- counterpoint was to attempt to 'arrange' a defense of that support by showing
- the other side.
-
- I don't see any problem with objectivity on Bill's side at all.
- fred
- --
- W. Fred Rump office: fred@COMPU.COM 'mans feet have grown/so big
- 26 Warren St. home: fred@icdi10.compu.com that he/forgets his littleness'
- Beverly, NJ. 08010 Don Marquis
- 609-386-6846 bang:uunet!cdin-1!icdi10!fr
-