home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / unix / question / 9605 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-07-30  |  891 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!auspex-gw!guy
  2. From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
  4. Subject: Re: need "ls"-like output w/full path
  5. Message-ID: <13835@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
  6. Date: 30 Jul 92 21:34:03 GMT
  7. References: <1992Jul17.161646.13107@cid.aes.doe.CA> <1992Jul17.190452.1265@news.eng.convex.com> <Bs7nrA.sK@cmptrc.lonestar.org>
  8. Sender: news@auspex-gw.auspex.com
  9. Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
  10. Lines: 11
  11. Nntp-Posting-Host: bootme.auspex.com
  12.  
  13. >What does everyone have against:
  14. >    find <dir> -print -path <dir> -only | sed 1d
  15.  
  16.     bootme$ find / -print -path / -only
  17.     find: bad option -path
  18.     Usage: find path-list predicate-list
  19.  
  20. Are "-path" and "-only" GNU "find"-isms?  If so, please bear in mind
  21. that not everybody on the planet with a UNIX system has GNU "find" on
  22. that system (you might claim that they *should*, but that does not alter
  23. the fact that they *don't*).
  24.