home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.unix.msdos:905 comp.unix.solaris:123 comp.unix.sysv386:12635
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.msdos,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!batcomputer!derwin.tc.cornell.edu!dfoody
- From: dfoody@derwin.tc.cornell.edu ()
- Subject: Re: ISC VP/ix Question(s)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul30.120431.3033@tc.cornell.edu>
- Keywords: ISC Unix VP/ix
- Sender: news@tc.cornell.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: derwin.tc.cornell.edu
- Organization: Cornell Theory Center
- References: <1992Jul13.195308.21397@access.digex.com> <BrGHIn.IMn@ernest.dseg.ti.com> <1992Jul29.204352.23016@sco.COM>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 12:04:31 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Jul29.204352.23016@sco.COM>, ezras@sco.COM (Ezra Steinberg) writes:
- |> If the 80386 cpu is being used to create virtual 8086s (i.e. running
- |> programs only in real mode), then programs designed to run on 80286
- |> cpus or better (i.e. in protected) mode will not be able to run with
- |> one of these emulators. Currently, I believe all popular emulators
- |> use the virtual 8086 method; hence, only real-mode programs can be run.
-
- How is OS/2 able to run protected mode applications such as Borland C++ 3.0?
- (Borland C++ 3.0 will only run using DPMI).
-
- Would it be possible to add this functionality to VP/ix or other UNIX based
- DOS emulators?
-
- Dan Foody
- dfoody@derwin.tc.cornell.edu
-