home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!hfsi!beattie
- From: beattie@hfsi.uucp (Brian Beattie)
- Subject: Re: I wonder, did AT&T backstab BSDI?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul30.161905.24122@hfsi.uucp>
- Keywords: AT&T speculation lawsuit BSDI
- Organization: /etc/organization
- References: <1992Jul29.144859.8222@bas-a.bcc.ac.uk> <1992Jul29.174437.18606@gateway.novell.com> <1992Jul29.201919.15968@kithrup.COM>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:19:05 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Jul29.201919.15968@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
- >In article <1992Jul29.174437.18606@gateway.novell.com> terry@thisbe.npd.Novell.COM (Terry Lambert) writes:
- >>Things AT&T owes to Berkeley:
- >
- >>4) Job control
- >
- >Other systems had job control long before BSD did.
-
- not UNIX systems from AT&T
-
- >
- >>5) csh
- >
- >I use bash or ksh. csh has too many problems.
-
- Yes but SystemV csh still comes from BSD
-
-
-