home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!news.funet.fi!kannel!news
- From: ats@lut.fi (Ari Suutari)
- Subject: Re: Do YOU think that this generates correct kernel ?
- Sender: news@lut.fi (Usenet News)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul29.091608.10321@lut.fi>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 09:16:08 GMT
- References: <1992Jul28.151518.18102@lut.fi> <1992Jul28.221939.2479@cognos.com>
- Organization: Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland
- Keywords: kernel config
- Lines: 25
-
- dealwisb@cognos.com (Brian de Alwis) writes:
-
- >controller wd0 at isa?
- >disk dk0 at wd0 drive 0
- >disk dk1 at wd0 drive 1
-
- >NWD is defined as 1 (which breaks the patches posted to support > 1 HD).
- >It seems that config is looking in the wrong places to figure out the
- >number of possibly-attached devices.
-
- I think that config works correctly, it just that naming of
- devices should be different. How about doing it like this:
-
- controller wdc0 at isa?
- disk wd0 at wc0 drive 0
- disk wd1 at wc0 drive 1
-
- This would, of cource, require some changes. wd.c should be wdc.c
- and files.i386 should be modified also. All references to NWD
- should also be checked and modified to NWDC if required.
-
- Now config would configure swap386bsd.c also correctly.
-
- Ari
-
-