home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: Precedent... Whitesmiths Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!!
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!unixland!rmkhome!rmk
- From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
- Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:52:31 GMT
- Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
- Message-ID: <9207270852.35@rmkhome.UUCP>
- References: <1992Jul21.142631.14517@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <mcuddy.711795634@fensende> <l6rld6INN3dh@neuro.usc.edu> <QIQHXX9@taronga.com>
- Keywords: AT&T Death Star rises over BSDIs horizon [Tel. 1-800-800-4BSD]
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <QIQHXX9@taronga.com> peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
- >>AT&T's claim though if litigated
- >>well -- and AT&T has some of the best attorneys in the country -- may form
- >>a basis for asserting a property right in virtually any compatible version
- >>of a UNIX type operating system.
- >
- >I believe there may be a precedent here, in the Whitesmiths C library and
- >Whitesmith's UNIX lookalike, from back in the early '80s. The original
- >release of Whitesmith's C and (I believe) Idris used a non-standard variant
- >of the UNIX standard I/O library to avoid any possible attack from AT&T (for
- >example, "putfmt()" instead of "printf()". This was changed, from what I
- >recall, after AT&T indicated that the interface defined in the UNIX
- >programmer's manual (the look and feel) was public domain.
- >
- >In addition, of course, there is the precedent of donating the setuid patent
- >to the public domain.
-
-
- AT&T checked out Coherent back in 1981, and just told them that they couldn't
- call it UNIX.
-
- --
-
- Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.UUCP unixland!rmkhome!rmk rmk@frog.UUCP
-