home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!gmhgate!cbp
- From: cbp@gmhgate.gmh.edu (Christopher Preston)
- Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!!
- Message-ID: <1992Jul25.051037.17727@gmhgate.gmh.edu>
- Organization: Grady Memorial Hospital
- References: <1992Jul21.104627.3353@mel.dit.csiro.au> <1992Jul21.131433.16450@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> <2cHS02Pi1bvx01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 05:10:37 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <2cHS02Pi1bvx01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> gab10@griffincd.amdahl.com (Gary A Browning) writes:
- >In article <1992Jul21.131433.16450@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>,
- >eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad) writes:
- >> In article <1992Jul21.104627.3353@mel.dit.csiro.au
- >smart@wanda.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU (Robert Smart) writes:
- >>
- >>> This is insanity. Surely this will be thrown out of court.
- >> Who is going to defend NET/2?
- >
- >The person/organization AT&T might sue in the future over NET/2.
- >
- >
- >I like the idea of sending letters of complaint to AT&T explaining
- >why you have requested changing your long-distance carrier. Seems like
- >fair play in light of AT&T's tactics.
- >
-
- What about sending letters to the Judge? Address? Though
- loosing a few customers might not mean much to AT&T, how
- about several hundred or a thousand letters to the judge
- (respectfully) expressing concern and perhaps a little
- anger over AT&T's unfair attempt at monopolization, with
- brief summaries of some of the points in the last
- hundred or so articles?
-
-
- cbp
- ---
- --
- Christopher Preston | I represent no opinions but my own.
- Datacommunications |
- Grady Memorial Hospital | "Let them eat pork rinds" - G. Bush
-