home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!chx400!sicsun!siisun.epfl.ch!brossard
- From: brossard@siisun.epfl.ch (Alain Brossard EPFL-SIC/SII)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.misc
- Subject: Re: Can I get rid of "ld.so: warning: /usr/lib/libc.so.1.foo.bar ..."
- Message-ID: <1992Jul27.094844@siisun.epfl.ch>
- Date: 27 Jul 92 07:48:44 GMT
- References: <1992Jul24.010617.11446@kronos.arc.nasa.gov> <1992Jul24.075143.27487@fwi.uva.nl> <14pb15INNel1@early-bird.think.com>
- Sender: news@sicsun.epfl.ch
- Reply-To: brossard@sic.epfl.ch
- Organization: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <14pb15INNel1@early-bird.think.com>, barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes:
- |> In article <1992Jul24.075143.27487@fwi.uva.nl> casper@fwi.uva.nl (Casper H.S. Dik) writes:
- |> >You can install the 4.1.2 libc on the 4.1.1 machines.
- |>
- |> I would be very nervous about doing this.
-
- I did this on a few machine here for about 4 months, the only problem
- I saw was that in.named seem to be slower at start up, the mount command
- later on in /etc/rc.local had to be delayed up to 10 seconds to make
- sure the hosts would be recognized ( I have a modified libc which uses
- the DNS directly and a dynamically linked mount). On the other hand,
- I noticed the same problem on quite a few 4.1.2 machines...
-
- --
-
- Alain Brossard, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne,
- SIC/SII, EL-Ecublens, CH-1015 Lausanne, Suisse, +41 21 693-2211
- brossard@sic.epfl.ch
-