home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / sys / next / programm / 5332 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-29  |  895 b   |  28 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!trirex!root
  3. From: mmelling @Trirex.com(Michael Mellinger)
  4. Subject: Re: Lint for Next? (SUMMARY)
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul29.020712.1211@Trirex.COM>
  6. Sender: root@Trirex.COM (Operator)
  7. Organization: Trirex Systems Inc.
  8. References: <1992Jul24.032523.10457@newsgate.sps.mot.com>
  9. Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 02:07:12 GMT
  10. Lines: 16
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Jul24.032523.10457@newsgate.sps.mot.com>  
  13. gregf@shaman.sps.mot.com (Greg Ferguson) writes:
  14. > Well, it appears that a true lint doesn't exist. Here's the notes  
  15. that've
  16. > come in today. It's unanimous for "cc -Wall file.c", for better or  
  17. worse.
  18. > 
  19. > Maybe release 3.0...
  20.  
  21. Turn optimization on too (-O) to get more information.  The dataflow  
  22. analysis stage gives your more information about unreachable code, etc.
  23.  
  24. This question should be in the FAQ list.  It gets asked several times a  
  25. year.
  26.  
  27. -Mike
  28.