home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / sys / next / misc / 18135 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-25  |  1.1 KB  |  25 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!rincewind.mech.Virginia.EDU!dmm0t
  3. From: dmm0t@rincewind.mech.Virginia.EDU (David Meyer)
  4. Subject: Re: Squash CORRECTION and question (was: Re: ModPlayer.app.squfold)
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul24.194519.13340@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
  6. Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
  7. Organization: University of Virginia
  8. References: <1992Jul24.004707.22709@morrow.stanford.edu> <ceQ1mSW00WBO42C1sh@andrew.cmu.edu> <Brwr02.Lr3@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
  9. Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 19:45:19 GMT
  10. Lines: 13
  11.  
  12. In article <Brwr02.Lr3@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu writes:
  13. >Since UnSquash is available as such, why isn't it used more often?  It
  14. >does a lot better compression than even zip and certainly better
  15. >compression than UNIX compress?
  16.  
  17. $$$.  UnSquash-only is available for free, but Squash itself costs
  18. money.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. -- 
  22. David M. Meyer                             Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering
  23. dmm0t@virginia.edu                         University of Virginia
  24. dmm0t@rincewind.mech.Virginia.EDU (NeXTmail)
  25.