home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!aj681
- From: aj681@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Carlin Wiegner)
- Subject: Re: NeXT's vs. mainframes -- sales of 6000 machines
- Message-ID: <1992Jul22.143247.27289@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ins.cwru.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cwns2.ins.cwru.edu
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 14:32:47 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
-
- oh, I agree.... At first, only one division of 500 people or
- so should be converted and then division by division they would
- convert over. 500 people is just about right to see if it can
- really work...
-
- UPDATE: I found out that most of their processing is done at
- night in batches. Thus, a distributed processing network would
- work. Just leave the machines on at night when you go home and
- the 500 machines would chug away at the claims, etc.
- CW
- --
-