home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!reed!orpheus
- From: orpheus@reed.edu (P. Hawthorne)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Subject: Re: Top Ten Things I'd Like to See in Think Pasal
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.181247.8354@reed.edu>
- Date: 24 Jul 92 18:12:47 GMT
- Article-I.D.: reed.1992Jul24.181247.8354
- References: <a69376dd@fairgate.uucp> <62669@cup.portal.com> <1992Jul23.181158.27079@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov>
- Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR
- Lines: 21
-
-
- Paul Robichaux, robichau@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov, writes:
- . Good != perfect. The overall quality of TP is high enough that none of my
- . wishes are major (i.e. I didn't have to ask for an excellent debugger, or
- . a function-level-smart linker.)
-
- (Couldn't help but notice the C syntax of your inequality... ;^)
-
- Incidentally, is there a debugger that ranks up there with Lightsbug?
- The only things I could hope for in the next version would probably be an
- Observe window that could cope with the implicit self parameter, and
- perhaps a calling graph browser. Well, maybe it would be nice to paste in
- the Groucho window, but these are all somewhat minor considerations which
- are really beside the point.
-
- If I was required to code on, say, a Unix box, could I find a source
- level debugger that compares?
-
-
- Theus (orpheus@reed.edu)
- --
-