home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!nsisrv!smoon@strfleet.gsfc.nasa.gov
- From: smoon@strfleet.gsfc.nasa.gov (Sang J. Moon)
- Subject: Re: Macs cost too much (NOT!)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul27.154019.2309@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>
- Sender: usenet@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: dschonvachler.gsfc.nasa.gov
- Organization: NASA GSFC Code 534.3
- References: <92203.173612ASI509@DJUKFA11.BITNET> <yL0aoB27w165w@mantis.co.uk> <CKD.92Jul25203701@loiosh.eff.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:40:19 GMT
- Lines: 103
-
- In article <CKD.92Jul25203701@loiosh.eff.org>, ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) writes:
- >
- > Sang> == Sang J. Moon <smoon@strfleet.gsfc.nasa.gov>
- >
- > Sang> However, if you have checked your hard drive with ResEdit, you
- > Sang> should see that your deleted statement about there being no
- > Sang> Desktop file was incorrect.
- >
- > I made no such statement. Please be more careful in attribution.
- >
- > Sang> You conveniently deleted your original statement that my post was
- > Sang> in response to in which you made absolute statements that mac
- > Sang> applications were all point and click installations and the worst
- > Sang> case mac application installation was a few minutes. I was
- > Sang> giving examples to prove the point that installation takes just
- > Sang> as much time and effort for either machines in general.
- >
- > I made no such statement. Please be more careful in attribution.
-
- Sorry. Let me show who made the statement to what I was posting the
- examples for.
-
- In article <ewright.711925511@convex.convex.com>, ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
- > Macintosh: Drag an application icon into a folder or (worst case)
- > double-click to run the installer.
- >
- > PC: Read the documentation to figure out the command line to run
- > the installer. (By the time you've finished this step, the Mac
- > user is already finished.) Type the command line and run the
- > installer. Now you have to install the icons in the Program
- > Manager and perhaps create a new program group. Then check the
- > CONFIG.SYS, WIN.INI, and AUTOEXEC.BAT files to see what modifications
- > the installer made there. Then check every other piece of software
- > to make sure it still works with the modifications. If it doesn't,
- > call technical support and try to work out some reasonable compromise
- > in the CONFIG.SYS, WIN.INI, and AUTOEXEC.BAT that will allow both
- > programs to run.
- >
- > Bestcase time for the Mac -- a few seconds.
- > Bestcase time for the PC -- a few minutes.
- > Worstcase time for the Mac -- a few minutes.
- > Worstcase time for the PC -- several weeks.
-
- In article <CKD.92Jul25203701@loiosh.eff.org>, ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) writes:
- > Sang> You can always find exceptions for specific software, but
- > Sang> installation of software in general takes just about the same
- > Sang> time on either machine.
- >
- > *In general* it takes more time to set up an application or function on
- > a PC-compatible machine. Certainly there are *some* PC programs that
- > are easier to set up than *some* Mac programs; I don't deny that.
- > However, using MS applications as an example of how tough Mac programs
- > are to set up is like using nuclear bombers as an example of how all
- > airplanes are bad and man was never meant to fly.
- >
- > Sang> This in turn is to point out that time "fiddling" with a PC is
- > Sang> not really a cost factor because in the long run it is
- > Sang> insignificant, and just as much time is spent on "fiddling" with
- > Sang> the mac albeit not in the exactly same ways (different machines
- > Sang> after all).
- >
- > It is a cost factor. I administer a network of about 20-30 Macs, and
- > one PC (as well as a number of Unix machines, routers, and whatnot).
- > The PC is the damndest headache of them all, administratively.
- [stuff deleted about how much harder it is to install a CD-ROM on a
- 486/33 than a mac]
-
- The point I am making is that the installation is a one-time deal on
- a PC, and that overall, the time spent on either machine "fiddling" is
- the same.
-
- Example:
- We have a center-wide mail system called Goddard mail which is archaic,
- but it has a huge user base. One of the things I do is connect macs and
- PCs to this mail system.
-
- Connecting a Mac to the Goddard mail system via the ROLM network:
- 1. Connect the cable from the modem port to the ROLM phone.
- 2. Install White Knight.
- 3. Configure White Knight with proper communications parameters and to
- capture text as a MSWD file.
- 4. Create a White Knight procedure to log into Goddard mail.
- 5. Configure Microsoft Word so that the default font is nonproportional.
- 6. Train the user to use Goddard mail with White Knight and Word.
-
- Connecting a PC to the Goddard mail system via the ROLM network:
- 1. Connect the cable from the serial port to the ROLM phone.
- 2. Install Smartcom.
- 3. Configure Smartcom with proper communications parameters.
- 4. Create a Smartcom macro to log into Goddard mail.
- 5. Train the user to Goddard mail with Smartcom and WordPerfect.
-
- We're not doing anything too fancy, and so far there are no significant
- difference in time supporting PCs and macs. Of I still get my share of
- simple questions for wither machine.
-
- > --
- > Christopher Davis * ckd@eff.org * System Administrator, EFF * +1 617 864 0665
- > ``The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the
- > point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation
- > to tolerate speech.'' --Justice Anthony Kennedy, in 91-155
-
- Sang J. Moon
-