home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!bluemoon!cmhgate!p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Adam.Frix
- From: Adam.Frix@p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Adam Frix)
- Sender: ufgate@cmhgate.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
- Subject: Re: FAQ -- AutoDoubler vs. Gatekeeper
- Message-ID: <906703.2A686D64@cmhgate.fidonet.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 92 04:29:11 EST
- Organization: FidoNet node 1:226/20.18 - cmhGate UF Gateway, Columbus OH
- Lines: 22
-
- chrisj@emx.cc.utexas.edu (Chris Johnson) writes:
-
- CJ> It's worth noting, by the way, that AutoDoubler initially
- CJ> had problems (some similar, some not) with both Virex and
- CJ> Virus Detective (probably others as well, but I only know
- CJ> about those two). Did Salient choose to fix their new product?
- CJ> No. Instead they got the authors of those two products to
- CJ> change their code to work around AutoDoubler.
-
- It's worth noting, by the way, that AutoDoubler has never had any such
- problems with Rival--an antivirus utility that also scans files as they're
- opened.
-
- Given that, my question is this: what is Rival doing, while retaining its
- antiviral capabilities, that Virex, VD, and GKA are doing differently?
-
- --Adam--
-
- --
- Adam Frix via cmhGate - Net 226 fido<=>uucp gateway Col, OH
- UUCP: ...!n8emr!bluemoon!cmhgate!20.18!Adam.Frix
- INET: Adam.Frix@p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG
-