home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!insctrl.jpl.nasa.gov!RFowler
- From: RFowler@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov (Robert A. Fowler)
- Subject: Re: 386/486 clock (1x or 2x)?
- Message-ID: <RFowler.302@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Sender: news@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: insctrl.jpl.nasa.gov
- Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- References: <RFowler.288@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov> <3713@svin02.info.win.tue.nl> <92209.140137REE700A@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:09:28 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <92209.140137REE700A@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> <REE700A@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
-
- >It probably has little or no impact on RF interference and only a slight
- >psychological ecffect on the dope at the FCC that licences it (Hey, this is
- >a computer, not an FM transmitter!) since many mainframes and workstations
- >have CPU clocks of 100 - 200 MHz. (covers most of the TV VHF, UHF and cable
- >TV bands, better stop that trend,too).
-
- BUT most mainframes are class C (industrial) FCC rating, while pc's are
- class B (residental) which is much more stringent, remeber the FCC reps (
- with radio DF equipment) at COMDEX the first year there were 386-33s?
- First day 10-20 vendors had motherboards in "FCC Aproved" boxes, second day
- only Everex(?) had a machine running.
- _________________________________________________________________
-
- HONDA -- The only way to fly
- o
- _/\_> -A proud owner (just wish they were made in the USA)
- O,> / O [with all respects to Ohio MINE were made in Japan]
-
- CM400T/XL500R/VF500F
- '79 '82 '84
-
- Slower trafic keep right (SUCKzukies, HDs, etc.) ->->->->->->->
- _________________________________________________________________
-
-