home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!newshub.ariel.yorku.ca!cs902125
- From: cs902125@ariel.yorku.ca (SHUK C YIP)
- Subject: Re: sz problem
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.061053.9436@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca>
- Sender: news@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca (USENET News System)
- Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
- References: <92203.155430WGLP09@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> <1992Jul22.041322.19517@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> <1992Jul22.184336.4694@wam.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 06:10:53 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Jul22.184336.4694@wam.umd.edu> walrus@wam.umd.edu (Udo K Schuermann) writes:
- >
- >I've gotten 237 and occasionally even 238 cps out of VLT using a rather old
- >Supra 2400. Not often, admittedly, but that's obviously not the fault of
- >VLT then. Perhaps the fact that my machine has a 68030 makes a difference,
- >but I doubt this can be very significant at only 2400 baud ...
- > Perhaps you should look into system load both on your machine and
- >the other end. Our systems here occasionally get so busy that the transfer
- >rate dropped to around 100 cps but again that wasn't VLT's fault either.
- > Are you using Fast RAM for the transfer or is all this happening in
- >Chip RAM?
- >
-
- I test the same file under the same condition. For Jr-Comm, I got 232
- cps. For VLT, I got 211 cps.
-