home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!faatcrl!jprad
- From: jprad@faatcrl.UUCP (Jack Radigan)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Subject: Re: JR-COMM Crashes 4 Me 2!
- Message-ID: <3377@faatcrl.UUCP>
- Date: 22 Jul 92 04:22:32 GMT
- References: <1992Jul15.182203.18822@rtsg.mot.com> <142kmjINN1lj@matt.ksu.ksu.edu> <1992Jul17.025544.4259@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1992Jul20.155518.25254@rtsg.mot.com>
- Organization: FAA Technical Center, Atlantic City NJ
- Lines: 15
-
- king@rtsg.mot.com (Steven King, Software Archaeologist) writes:
-
- >It's a bit of both, I believe. The Supra shouldn't allow incoming text
- >to get intermingled with its "CONNECT xxxxx" string, but JRComm
- >shouldn't choke on the "garbage" coming in either. A robust program
- >won't crash the system for a simple input error.
-
- Corrupting the CONNECT response is not something I'd classifuy as a "simple"
- or even common occurance. I'm sure that there are plenty of "robust"
- programs out there that also exhibit bizzare problems for rare or unusual
- conditions.
-
- That doesn't mean I won't fix it though... ;-)
-
- -jack-
-