home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!fuug!demos!kiae!glas!demos!lub001.lamar.edu!booth
- From: booth@lub001.lamar.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
- Date: 18 Jul 92 09:45 MDT
- Subject: Re: Lantastic and TCP/IP
- Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@glas.apc.org>
- Message-ID: <1992Jul16.221208.1325@lub001.lam>
- References: <CATONE.92Jul13002456@sovereign.d>
- Nf-ID: #R:CATONE.92Jul13002456@sovereign.d:-2097222805:1992Jul16.221208.1325@lub001.lam:-964385282:001:1195
- Nf-From: lub001.lamar.edu!booth Jul 18 09:45:00 1992
- Lines: 33
-
-
- In article <CATONE.92Jul13002456@sovereign.dmark.wharton.upenn.edu>, catone@dmark.wharton.upenn.edu (Tony Catone) writes:
- >
- > A Unix host is required to do authentication, but is not needed for
- > anything else - ie you can still use ftp, telnet etc. What level of file
- > sharing do you need ? If you want nfs you are going to have problems.
- > [...]
- > You really need a multitasking machine for a server - OS/2 is the cheapest
- > way to get it.
- >
- > Not true. You can use SOSS, the public domain NFS server to share files.
- > It requires a dedicated machine and can only share a few thousand files
- > before you run out of DOS memory to handle the inode list, but I use it
- > often and it works just fine. You can ftp the version with a couple of
- > bug fixes I added from hilbert.wharton.upenn.edu in pub/tcpip.
- >
- >
- > - Tony
- > catone@dmark.wharton.upenn.edu
- >
- >
-
-
- Sorry I missed the earlier threads on this.
-
- Should I assume that TCP/IP and LANtastic are compatible using Packet Drivers
- or NDIS? Where might I get more info on this. This is a critical task for me
- to get CUTCP and/or PC/TCP and LANtastic talking on the same adapter.
-
-
- John Booth
- booth@lub001.lamar.edu
-
-