home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.protocols.tcp-ip:3937 comp.protocols.pcnet:56
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.pcnet
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!fuug!kiae!relcom!usenet
- From: saty@ntc.togliatti.su (Sergey A. TsYbanov)
- Subject: Problem remain the same ( about Clemson University Packet Driver )?
- Message-ID: <AJRpGUgWe7@ntc.togliatti.su>
- Lines: 30
- Sender: news-service@kiae.su
- Reply-To: saty@ntc.togliatti.su
- Organization: AutoVAZ Research & Development Centre
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 92 13:50:19 +0400
-
- Hi !
-
- rh0083b@medtronic.COM (Roger-Hunen) writes :
-
- > I suppose that you try to send a packet while you are in the receiver
- > (called by the packet driver)? Well, I vaguely remember a statement from
- > Russ Nelson that this may not work with 1.09 compliant drivers. The spec
- > does not say anything about this, but the general consensus is that it is
- > bad practice.
-
- I don't understand why it is BAD practice. "DE200PD.SYS" for DE-200 card
- has not this bug.
-
- > What you could do is to have the response packet sent at the next timer
- > interrupt.
-
- I think that it is not a solution B-(.
- Priority of IRQ0 ( timer device ) greater than priority of IRQ
- of ethernet card and timer interrupt may be occured while receiver
- of packet driver works. Problem remain the same ?
-
- ! iH
- --
- ******************* Is There Anybody Out There ? **********************
- * SATY ( Sergey A. TsYbanov ). *
- * E-mail : saty@ntc.togliatti.su Phone : number +7 (8482) 378-17-53. *
- ***********************************************************************
-
-
-
-