home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.protocols.tcp-ip:3834 comp.protocols.pcnet:54
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.pcnet
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!mmm.serc.3m.com!pwcs!medtron!rh0083b
- From: rh0083b@medtronic.COM (Roger-Hunen)
- Subject: Re: Clemson University Packet Driver: I have one problem B-(.
- Message-ID: <1992Jul27.072637.12601@medtron.medtronic.com>
- Sender: news@medtron.medtronic.com (USENET News Administration)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tin.pace.medtronic.com
- Organization: Medtronic, Inc.
- References: <AJOhJRg8RQ@ntc.togliatti.su>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 07:26:37 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <AJOhJRg8RQ@ntc.togliatti.su> saty@ntc.togliatti.su writes:
- >I write some application ( TSR type ) based on Packet Driver
- >( Clemson University Engineering Comp Ops Version 9) and I have
- >one tragic problem. I can not send ethernet packets while
- >my receive handle works. How can I do it correctly?
- >My ethernet card is 3C505.
-
- I suppose that you try to send a packet while you are in the receiver
- (called by the packet driver)? Well, I vaguely remember a statement from
- Russ Nelson that this may not work with 1.09 compliant drivers. The spec
- does not say anything about this, but the general consensus is that it is
- bad practice.
-
- What you could do is to have the response packet sent at the next timer
- interrupt.
-
- Regards,
- -Roger
-
-