home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / programm / 2119 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-27  |  1.0 KB  |  30 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.programming
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!gupw
  3. From: gupw@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (Paul Wagland)
  4. Subject: Re: Is 2.0 PM very different from 1.x PM?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul28.010653.591@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
  6. Organization: University of Western Australia
  7. References: <1992Jul27.014642.4971@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> <1992Jul27.060114.24689@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
  8. Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 01:06:53 GMT
  9. Lines: 19
  10.  
  11. dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann) writes:
  12.  
  13. >In article <1992Jul27.014642.4971@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>, gupw@uniwa (Paul Wagland) writes:
  14. >>Is programming for PM under v2.0 much different than under v1.x?
  15. >What's `PM'?
  16.  
  17. >>The reason I wish to know is that the only PM programming books around
  18. >>here are for OS/2 v1.x.
  19. >Oh.  Some ibm thing, huh?  Maybe you could try asking in an ibm group?
  20.  
  21. OK Sorry Guys.  I accidently posted this to the wrong newsgroup.
  22.  
  23. Sorry!
  24.  
  25. Paul
  26. -- 
  27. Paul Wagland            | These opinions are mine and no-one elses
  28. gupw@uniwa.uwa.edu.au   | I still don't like Microsoft, even after using
  29. ------------------------+  their products. :-)
  30.