home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!olivea!spool.mu.edu!wupost!uwm.edu!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
- From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Dvorak switches to OS/2!!
- Message-ID: <1992Jul30.171259.19368@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 30 Jul 92 17:12:59 GMT
- References: <26JUL199219020957@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> <heinz.02pw@edohwg.UUCP> <28JUL199215144041@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu>
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
- In article <28JUL199215144041@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> cvadrtbc@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu (Srikanth Viswanathan) writes:
-
- >You do have a point about the regular users not havign the facilities to
- >get the patches, but I still think that his statement about NEEDING a
- >386/33 is off base. I guess I should be happy that OS/2 is getting some
- >postiive press though!
-
- I don't see a problem. The people who buy products based on
- columnists' recommendations would get really teed off at him if the
- system didn't work great the first time around. By recommending a
- 386/33 or better, people who have problems due to speed/memory can't
- complain to him.
-
- If a user had a 386/25 (or 16...), he'll think he got away with
- something and will be satisfied. If Dvorak had recommended an sx/16,
- people would complain about speed and he would lose face explaining it
- to the masses.
-
-
-
-
- --
- |) David Charlap "I don't even represent myself
- /|_ dic5340@hertz.njit.edu sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
- ((|,)
- ~|~ Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
-