home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!nevada.edu!jimi!slumos
- From: slumos@unlv.edu (Steve Lumos)
- Subject: Re: Dvorak switches to OS/2!!
- Message-ID: <1992Jul29.021334.20138@unlv.edu>
- Sender: news@unlv.edu (News User)
- Organization: UNLV Computer Science
- References: <l6uvg3INN8nr@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu> <26JUL199219020957@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> <heinz.02pw@edohwg.UUCP>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 02:13:34 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <heinz.02pw@edohwg.UUCP> heinz@edohwg.UUCP (Heinz Wrobel) writes:
- >IMHO you need at least 8MB to get something done with OS/2 but that's
- >debatable. He's right with most ET4000 boards, though. With the OS/2
- >package I can buy at any store, I eventually get nice flashy fireworks with
- >my ET4000. Poor B.J. user won't be able to get patches and updates easily.
- >It took me almost three weeks to get my OS/2 package running just becuase I
- >couldn't get a hold of a driver update...
-
- I don't think that saying most ET4000 boards will not work with OS/2
- is correct. It is only the newer version of the chip that has
- problems. I could be wrong but I was assuming that the newer chip was
- so new that they did not have time to test it. At any rate, I would
- set the number around 30% if that high...
-
- --
- Steve Lumos - slumos@cs.unlv.edu
-