home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!ukma!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
- From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: The Future of OS/2
- Message-ID: <1992Jul27.193809.13150@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 27 Jul 92 19:38:09 GMT
- References: <LJ6DoB1w164w@netlink.cts.com> <1992Jul24.135954.25255@wraxall.inmos.co.uk> <1992Jul24.122406.86@physc1.byu.edu>
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
- In article <1992Jul24.122406.86@physc1.byu.edu> robertson@physc1.byu.edu writes:
- >
- > I know for me the Windows compatibility will only make a difference
- > in the short run. All of the applications I use are intending to
- > make a OS/2 compatible version soon. Thus, why would I upgrade to
- > the windows version, when I can upgrade to apps that take advantage
- > of OS/2's superior archetecture. I intended to delete the winos2
- > stuff from my hard drive no later than March of 93(I know I will
- > need the HD space.)
-
- You too? Right now, the only Windows app I really use is Word, and
- not much of that, either. As soon as MS gets Word 2.0 for OS/2 out
- (please let it be soon), I'll probably trash my WINOS2 system as well.
- Well, I may keep it around for WinGif and minesweeper...
- --
- |) David Charlap "I don't even represent myself
- /|_ dic5340@hertz.njit.edu sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
- ((|,)
- ~|~ Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
-