home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!network.ucsd.edu!qualcom.qualcomm.com!cancun!rdippold
- From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Stupid (i.e. neat) CMD.EXE tricks
- Message-ID: <rdippold.712117111@cancun>
- Date: 26 Jul 92 02:18:31 GMT
- References: <1992Jul25.142254.7192@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <Jul.25.11.06.58.1992.10343@gauss.rutgers.edu>
- Sender: news@qualcomm.com
- Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
- Lines: 16
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cancun.qualcomm.com
-
- greenfie@gauss.rutgers.edu (Greenfie) writes:
- >In article <1992Jul25.142254.7192@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith) writes:
- >> sl31+@andrew.cmu.edu (Stephen M. Lacy) writes:
- >>
- >> > Point two: When working with windowed command shells, you can neatly
- >> > scroll around the window without using the scroll bars...
- >>
- >> Can Windows 3.1 do this?
- >Who cares! This is exactly the attitude that makes people frown at OS/2
- >supporters. This is an OS/2 discussion. OS/2 can do this. It is a useful
- >thing to know. So what does it matter if windows can/can't do it?
-
- Because he keeps the list of X Things OS/2 does that Windows Doesn't.
- This might be another one.
- --
- In this quote, the concluding three words 'were left out'.
-