home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!emory!uumind!overmind!unixg.ubc.ca.citadel!News
- From: unixg.ubc.ca!ochealth@overmind.mind.org
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: OO File system (was re: os/2's som)
- Message-ID: <2178344@overmind.citadel>
- Date: 22 Jul 92 21:44:00 GMT
- Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
- Lines: 33
- X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
- X-Spam-content: irrelevant
-
- In article <BrssDz.Dyw@apollo.hp.com> ced@APOLLO.HP.COM (Carl Davidson)
- writes:
- >
- >The best example of an object-oriented file system I know of is the
- >Apollo Domain file system. It does *precisely* what Pete describes,
- >i.e. the I/O system knows how to determine the type of object you are
- >
-
- Hahahahhahha!
-
- If NT has an operating system like Domain, it'll fall flat on it's
- face! Domain's BSD type UNIX sucked rocks! Incompatible, unstable,
- unpredictable, etc.
-
- Gimme Sun hardware/software any day over Apollo. Good thing HP bailed
- Apollo out.
-
- >--
- >Carl Davidson (508) 436-4361 |
- >Chelmsford System Software Lab | Microkernels: Where less is more.
- >The Hewlett-Packard Company |
- >DOMAIN: ced@apollo.hp.com |
-
-
- --
-
- _____________________________________________________________________________
- _
- jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca
- Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isN'T
- ___
- Insert VapourFeature
- ^^^
-