home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!cunews!nrcnet0!bnrgate!bmerh85!bcars64a!bqneh3!schow
- From: schow@bqneh3.bnr.ca (Stanley T.H. Chow)
- Subject: Re: New Name for OS/2?
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.194734.1789@bcars64a.bnr.ca>
- Keywords: The Integration Platform
- Sender: news@bcars64a.bnr.ca (Usenet News)
- Organization: Bell Northern Research Ltd, Ottawa
- References: <1992Jul28.043400.25662@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 19:47:34 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Jul28.043400.25662@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mike Levis) writes:
- >:From: sip1@quads.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
- >:(2) Intuition 1.0. OK, so perhaps this name stretches credibility. I wouldn't
- >: call Windows intuitive. When my PC starts asking _me_ the right questions
- >: I'll spring for intuitive. The name also sounds a bit squishy, if that's
- >: an adjective. But it isn't too bad.
-
- Sorry, Commodore called their Amiga system Intuition. (Intuition is
- the kernal portion, as opposed to the AmigaDOS portion).
-
-
-
- --
- Stanley Chow InterNet: schow@BNR.CA
- Bell Northern Research UUCP: ..!uunet!bnrgate!bqneh3!schow
- (613) 763-2831
- Me? Represent other people? Don't make them laugh so hard.
-