home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
- From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: Impressions of the July NT Release
- Keywords: NT
- Message-ID: <1992Jul22.171109.22787@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 22 Jul 92 17:11:09 GMT
- References: <GTR-Vx=@engin.umich.edu> <rdippold.711768386@cancun>
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
- In article <rdippold.711768386@cancun> rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:
- >
- >They could do the usual and ship an extremely buggy X.0 version and
- >claim that they made the deadline, then release a X.0a version in a
- >while with most of the bug-fixes to those who bitch about the bugs,
- >then a year or so later release version X.1, which is what the product
- >should have been all along.
-
- Which is what all the Microsoft advocates are complaining about when
- IBM did the same thing. And OS/2 2.0 (CSD level 0200 - GA) is far
- from extremely buggy. Its bugs are (for the most part) harmless
- annoyances.
-
- --
- |) David Charlap "I don't even represent myself
- /|_ dic5340@hertz.njit.edu sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
- ((|,)
- ~|~ Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
-