home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- From: jes@grendel.demon.co.uk (Jim Segrave)
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!grendel.demon.co.uk!jes
- Subject: Re: Guidelines for reporting Linux bugs
- Distribution: world
- References: <1992Jul28.134834.4764@dg-rtp.dg.com>
- Organization: None
- Lines: 46
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 00:41:28 +0000
- Message-ID: <712482088snx@grendel.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@gate.demon.co.uk
-
-
- In article <1992Jul28.134834.4764@dg-rtp.dg.com> welshm@snail.rtp.dg.com (Matt Welsh) writes:
-
- > **** GUIDELINES FOR REPORTING LINUX BUGS ****
- >
- > Last updated: 20 Jul 92
- >
- > *** This file specifies how you should file bug reports and bug report
- > *** updates (such as fixes and workaround reports). PLEASE READ before
- > *** you do anything!!
- >
- > If you are having problems with Linux, the first thing you should do is
- > POST your problem or possible bug to comp.os.linux or send it out on
- > one of the several mailing lists. In this way, others can verify your
- > problem and find out if it's actually a bug.
-
- NO! NO! NO!
- The first thing is - check the FAQ.
- Then, think about the problem yourself - I've seen some fairly silly
- Help with ... reports which seemed to assume that 'GCC/Linux/any of a
- large number of other utillities must be broken because they don't work
- for me'. Use simple logic - the volume of traffic in this group
- indicates that most things *do* work, so if they don't work for you the
- most likely reasons are that you didn't understand the (sometimes
- sketchy) documentation or you didn't follow it, or you are running an
- old version of Linux/gcc/whatever and trying to run software set up for
- a more recent version, etc.
- If you still can't solve it, see if there's someone
- knowledgable you can ask - colleague at work, fellow student, etc.
- If all this fails, then post the problem.
- The benefits are:
- 1) You'll learn more by trying to solve the problem yourself.
- 2) You'll understand the problem better if you really do need to post
- the report, and your report will be clearer. You'll be able to save
- everyone sending you stock answers like 0.95's tar is broken, etc.
- because you will have checked the FAQ, chekced your version of tar, etc.
- and your message will be able to say I'm running this version...
- 3) There will be less pressure to split comp.os.linux because there
- won't be as many silly bug reports/help requests which really have been
- answered over and over again.
- 4) The experts who can answer your questions will be less likely to have
- become tired of answering repetitive pleas for help.
-
- --
- Jim Segrave (Segrave Software Services) jes@grendel.demon.co.uk
-
-