home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!murthy
- From: murthy@cs.cornell.edu (Chet Murthy)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: BSD Unix aka Freedom is a myth....
- Message-ID: <1992Jul21.112705.6276@cs.cornell.edu>
- Date: 21 Jul 92 11:27:05 GMT
- References: <23992@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Distribution: comp
- Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
- Lines: 27
-
- >Sender: merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin)
- >[Lots of stuff deleted from a press release or newspaper article?]
-
- >Further, AT&T's question about the time investment of BSDI in bringing out
- >their product [compared with their own cost over many years] will likely go
- >a long way toward supporting their unfair competition claim. If it took a
- >small company like BSDI only a couple of years with a small team of people
- >to produce BSD/386 vs the multi year investment of a corporate giant - then
- >it is very possible AT&T may prevail on the unfair competition claim.
-
- Y'know, Doug Comer's XINU, Linus Torvalds' Linux, Tanenbaum's Minix,
- and I'm sure there are others, all stand as good arguments that the technology
- if UNIX isn't just an AT&T invention anymore - the V sytem, Mach,
- ad a zillin other ways of implementing the core of UNIX exist.
-
- I think that even if BSDI fails, even if 386BSD fails, and even
- if the entire Berkeley net2 distrib gets nuked,
- free unix is perhaps 2 years away - in 2 years, linux will be stable.
- In two years, the GNU Hurd will be stable. And AT&T can
- do almost nothing abot that, eh?
-
- But you're right - I'm pissed, too. From what I heard of the history,
- BSD started with V6 unix, a developed a _whole_ _lot_
- of what currently constitutes UNIX. To claim that AT&T did ti all is
- goinga bit far.
-
- --chet--
-