home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.org.eff.talk:4940 alt.security:4033 alt.drugs:13705 alt.hackers.malicious:49 alt.censorship:6405
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk,alt.security,alt.drugs,alt.hackers.malicious,alt.censorship
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!decwrl!csus.edu!netcomsv!mork!rcain
- From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
- Subject: Re: Phantom Access - EFF
- Message-ID: <7lnmr#k.rcain@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 09:44:23 GMT
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Jul27.185036.22561@eff.org>
- Lines: 35
-
- mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin) writes:
- : In article <dank.712258012@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov> dank@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov (Dan Kegel) writes:
- : >blain@netcom.com (Blain Strickel) writes:
- : >>The EFF from the results I have received is an organization without a purpose
- : >>and without a following. Only 52 people even had == opinions == about what
- : >>the EFF is doing...
- : >
- : >Perhaps if you had chosen a more interesting subject than "Phantom Access",
- : >more serious people would have read your original poll, i.e. it's not just
- : >EFF that has trouble getting a coherent message to the masses :-)
- : >I certainly support the EFF wholeheartedly.
- :
- : Dan's point is precisely the one I would have made if I'd gotten here
- : first. Blain Strickel's poll is a sampling of a highly unrepresentative
- : fraction of the readership of this newsgroup: specifically, those who
- : read the postings in the thread "Re: Phantom Access - EFF" *and* who were
- : willing to take the time to respond to Strickel's poll.
- :
- : Blain's poll, and the conclusions he draws from it, demonstrate some of
- : the hazards of unsystematic and unscientific opinion-gathering.
- :
- :
- : --Mike
-
-
- Sorry to take you this far but there is a Phangom Octipus universe
- attempting communication. Just say no.
-
- Bob
-
- --
- Bob Cain rcain@netcom.com 408-358-2007
-
- I love the Olympics!!!!
-
-