home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!newcastle.ac.uk!turing!ncrr
- From: C.R.Ritson@newcastle.ac.uk (C.R. Ritson)
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Subject: Re: Enhancement request for ELM filter command
- Keywords: filter
- Message-ID: <Bs3CqG.F66@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 08:54:15 GMT
- References: <1214@ki.com> <14nsc6INNbh7@betty.cs.widener.edu> <1215@ki.com> <cos.712183928@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu> <1992Jul26.231451.9856@DSI.COM>
- Organization: University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: turing
-
- syd@DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein) writes:
-
- >Ok folks, every one asks for things in Filter for 2.4, but no one volunteers
- >to work on them. Well, I do have something to say about this....
- >Filter is 'dying' because no one wants to work on it and fix/enhance it.
-
- Does anyone have any opinions as to the best alternatives for filter,
- ininitally in a sendmail/smtp environment? If filter does die, I (as
- system's admin) will get requests for something else.
-
- If there are good alternatives, then perhaps filter should be helped
- to die, by stating explicitly that it will not live after 2.4...
-
- Chris Ritson.
- EMAIL: C.R.Ritson@newcastle.ac.uk Chris Ritson,
- PHONE: +44 91 222 8175 Department of Computing Science
- FAX : +44 91 222 8232 University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
- TELEX: uk+53654-UNINEW_G UK, NE1 7RU
-