home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
- From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Language extensions for run-time type identification
- Message-ID: <23284@alice.att.com>
- Date: 23 Jul 92 01:35:30 GMT
- Article-I.D.: alice.23284
- References: <14ft2uINNjh4@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Jul21.143131.6902@cadsun.corp.mot.com> <rmartin.711829160@thor>
- Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner NJ
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <rmartin.711829160@thor> rmartin@thor.Rational.COM (Bob Martin) writes:
-
- > Posh! Every class should have a virtual destructor. It is insane not
- > to declare the destructor virtual. There is only one, small,
- > exception to this rule, which has to do with structs placed in ROM...
-
- How about classes associated with small objects, such as Complex and Point?
- --
- --Andrew Koenig
- ark@europa.att.com
-