home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
- From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Committee Members -> What do you think?
- Message-ID: <23281@alice.att.com>
- Date: 22 Jul 92 20:27:31 GMT
- Article-I.D.: alice.23281
- References: <1992Jul13.172044.5706@microsoft.com> <1992Jul15.144839.18494@sco.COM> <1992Jul17.194202.14981@microsoft.com> <1992Jul20.150341.5723@sco.COM>
- Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner NJ
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Jul20.150341.5723@sco.COM> paul@sco.COM (Paul Jackson) writes:
-
- > The committee does have the mandate to fix "clear" deficiencies in the
- > language. Most people feel that this included templates and exception
- > handling. Many people feel that it includes little else.
-
- The letter from Hewlett-Packard to X3 that requested formation of the
- committee in the first place explicitly mentioned templates and exception
- handling as being within the scope of the proposed committee. Those two
- extensions therefore have uniquely special status.
- --
- --Andrew Koenig
- ark@europa.att.com
-