home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!rutgers!ub!dsinc!pitt.edu!gvls1!tredysvr!cellar!rpost
- From: rpost@cellar.org (hamilton)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Borland vs. Microsoft (vs. Zinc)
- Message-ID: <6k55NB7w164w@cellar.org>
- Date: 19 Jul 92 03:51:52 GMT
- Sender: bbs@cellar.org (The Cellar BBS)
- Organization: The Cellar BBS and public access system
- Lines: 12
-
- It seems to me, that the very fact that Zinc has a GUI that permits the
- programmer to develop in any interface, indicates that Zinc has the more
- superior GUI object. Currently I am using ObjectWindows. Unfortunately
- Software Engineering requires we take other issues into consideration
- besides natural law. Namely, what is the size of the target base?
- Companies developing products will not be interested if you know an
- obscure, but better designed, system versus a well know but *kludged*
- system.
-
- What can you do?
-
- See you in Pittsburgh...
-